The Headache of Back Pain-Juniper publishers
JUNIPER PUBLISHERS-OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL OF HEAD NECK & SPINE SURGERY
Short Communication
Patients presenting with pure low back pain are among
the most challenging problems to deal with for a spine surgeon. In many
cases it already becomes clear that there are no surgical options for a
particular patient and they are referred to (often once again) physical
therapy, cognitive training, pain clinics etc. But in a small number of
patients the spine surgeon’s attention gets caught by some
characteristic features in the patient’s history and images. These are
usually patients of around 40 years of age presenting with a single
level discopathy and a history of “mechanical back pain”. Discogenic
pain is assumed to originate from nerve in growth into the innermost
disc mediated by proinflammatory cytokines [1,2].
Although surgery in these patients is still under
heavy debate there are many surgeons who would consider a surgical
option. These options usually consist of a fusion using one of the many
available techniques or a disc replacement. There has been an enormous
surge in fusion surgery where the proper indication can raise doubt.
The key to a good result lies in proper patient
selection. And it is exactly this feature that makes dealing with the
problem so challenging. First of all there is the patient’s history of
“mechanical” back pain. This is understood as pain arising during
activities and subsiding when resting or lying flat. The daily course of
complaints and the influence of rest, mobility, and posture have been
identified as relevant indicators [3,4]. In a recent study the presence
or absence of a positive “loading factor” was unrelated to outcome [5].
Imaging usually shows a single level discopathy
(“black disc”) with signs as described by Modic [6]. The etiology of
these changes is under debate [7-10]. In our recent study we could not
find a clear predictive value of Modic changes for outcome, as also
reported by Lautsen et al. and Ohtori et al. [5,11,12].
Other than MRI one of the still more or less standard
investigations is a discography of the affected level, often combined
with an adjacent level for reference [13]. The evidence for the
usefulness is however weak and it has been suggested that the injection
may even lead to accelerated degeneration [14-18]. This is especially
critical when investigating non symptomatic discs. In our study the test
was of no value [5]. Not so widespread is the application of a
pantaloons cast, covering the lumbar region up to about T10 and one
thigh of the patients choice. This is worn as long as feasible or till a
clear result in the form of pain reduction of > 50% has been
achieved. In our study the test proved to be valuable in a subset of
patients without prior surgery [5]. We suggest that other than physical
properties in undergoing this cumbersome test there is also an
assessment of the patients mind set and determination for a good
outcome.
So, after all these difficulties in determining the
right patient, how do we find the best treatment? In a retrospective
analysis of 262 patients with a follow up of up of 2 to 9 years the
result was satisfactory in about 80% [19]. The cohort included patients
with different types of fusion as well as total disc replacement (TDR).
In an overview Berg concluded that TDR was at least as good as fusion
especially on the short term [20]. This is in keeping with my own
experience over 15 years. Many recent trials however show that fusion
surgery does not produce better results than conservative treatment
[21,22]. Where this may hold true for the treatment of degenerative disc
disease (DDD) in the general population there are subsets of patients
that will truly benefit more from surgical treatment. Research should
focus on identifying parameters that have a good predictive value for
outcome.
To know more about Open Access Journal of
Head Neck & Spine Surgery please click on:
To know more about Open access Journals
Publishers please click on : Juniper Publishers
Comments
Post a Comment